UI/UX Design Courses in Delhi — Fees, Faculty & Reviews 2026

Real fee breakdown — ask for all of these:

                            INSTITUTE A   INSTITUTE B
Course fee                  ₹______       ₹______
Duration (months)           ______        ______
Live hours                  ______        ______
Recorded hours              ______        ______

PORTFOLIO REVIEW
Weekly review sessions?     Y / N         Y / N
Who reviews?                ______        ______
Written feedback given?     Y / N         Y / N

TOOLS
Figma (core)                Y / N         Y / N
Sketch / Adobe XD           Y / N         Y / N
Prototyping tools           Y / N         Y / N
Design systems              Y / N         Y / N

CAREER
Portfolio review at end?    Y / N         Y / N
Mock interviews?            Y / N         Y / N
Placement scope in writing  Y / N         Y / N

TOTAL REAL COST             ₹______       ₹______

Rule of thumb:
Under ₹30k  → usually self-paced, minimal review
₹40–70k     → should include weekly portfolio
               review and mock interviews
₹90k+       → must include mentorship and real
               project work

Any UI/UX course over ₹50k without
weekly portfolio review is overpriced
regardless of brand.

Portfolio review is the whole point.

UI/UX cannot be learned from videos.
Design is learned through feedback on your
own work. Without weekly review, you're
copying tutorials.

What a real review session includes:
☐ Show your work in progress (Figma file)
☐ Trainer critiques layout, hierarchy,
  interactions
☐ Other students give feedback
☐ Written notes on what to fix
☐ Next iteration reviewed again

What "review" often actually means:
✗ "Submit the final project, we grade it"
✗ "Join the Slack and ask questions"
✗ "The trainer will see it when you graduate"

Cost of real portfolio review to the institute:
- Trainer time: 2-4 hours per student per week
- Figma licence: ~₹1,000/month per seat
- Significant

If the fee is ₹25,000 for 3 months
with "portfolio review", check carefully —
that usually means one review at the end.

The single most valuable feature of a
UI/UX course is weekly, iterative feedback
on your own work. Everything else is
secondary.

Questions to ask the counsellor:

1. Who will teach this batch — full name?
2. Can I see their portfolio (Dribbble /
   Behance / personal site)?
3. What products have they shipped, and
   where can I see them live?
4. Can I sit in a live session before paying?
5. What's the batch size, and does it grow?
6. How many portfolio review sessions per
   month, and with whom?
7. What happens if the trainer leaves
   mid-batch?
8. How is feedback delivered — written,
   verbal, on the Figma file?
9. Does the course cover design research
   and user testing, or just Figma?
10. What does "placement support" mean,
    in writing?

Red flags on faculty:
✗ "Trainer will be assigned after enrolment"
✗ "Our trainers have industry experience"
   (but can't name them)
✗ No portfolio link
✗ "We use a team of mentors"
   (means no one is accountable)
✗ Portfolio is only student work, not
   the trainer's own

In UI/UX, a trainer's portfolio is more
telling than their bio. If their own work
isn't good, they can't teach you to make
good work.

UI/UX curriculum audit — tick what's actually
covered in depth:

FOUNDATIONS
☐ Design principles (hierarchy, contrast,
  balance)
☐ Typography
☐ Colour theory
☐ Layout grids and spacing

USER RESEARCH
☐ Interview techniques
☐ Personas and journey maps
☐ Competitive analysis
☐ Usability testing

INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE
☐ Sitemaps
☐ User flows
☐ Navigation patterns
☐ Card sorting

WIREFRAMING & PROTOTYPING
☐ Low-fidelity wireframes
☐ High-fidelity mockups
☐ Interactive prototypes (Figma)
☐ Micro-interactions and animations

DESIGN SYSTEMS
☐ Component libraries
☐ Tokens
☐ Documentation
☐ Accessibility (WCAG basics)

CASE STUDY WRITING
☐ Problem framing
☐ Process documentation
☐ Before/after with rationale
☐ Impact and metrics

TOOLS
☐ Figma (core)
☐ Prototyping (Figma / Principle)
☐ Optional: Framer, Webflow
☐ Miro / FigJam for research

Missing more than five boxes?
The course is a Figma tutorial series,
not UI/UX training.

Review scorecard (rate 1-5):

Teaching clarity           [ ]
Portfolio review quality   [ ]
Project realism            [ ]
Doubt resolution           [ ]
Trainer's own portfolio    [ ]
Placement honesty          [ ]
Value for the fee          [ ]

TOTAL: ___ / 35

Only count a review if it mentions:
- A trainer by name, OR
- A specific project, OR
- A specific problem and how it was resolved

Ignore generic "great institute, highly
recommended" reviews — they carry no
information.

A good review reads like a case study.
A bad review reads like a marketing
paragraph.

Also check:
- Alumni portfolio on Behance / Dribbble
- Do they look designed, or do they look
  like template clones?
- Do the case studies show process, or
  just pretty screens?

Red flags specific to UI/UX courses:

✗ "Learn UI/UX in 2 months" — tool basics,
  yes; real UX, no.
✗ Trainer has no portfolio.
✗ Trainer's portfolio is all concept work
  (no real products, no real users).
✗ Curriculum is Figma-centric with no
  research, IA, or testing.
✗ No portfolio review sessions, only
  submission at the end.
✗ "Portfolio will be provided"
  (meaning you copy a template).
✗ Placement claims without alumni on
  LinkedIn with UX titles.
✗ Course teaches "design trends" without
  fundamentals.
✗ Student work is all visually identical
  (means everyone was taught one template).
✗ No mention of accessibility or user
  testing.

The ethical part matters more than the
tools.

A course that teaches you to make pretty
screens without teaching you why they work
is producing decoration, not design.

The warning sign in student work:
If every portfolio from the same batch
looks like the same template, the trainer
is teaching a style, not a process.

That's the single most reliable signal.

UI/UX course comparison sheet:

                     INSTITUTE A   INSTITUTE B   INSTITUTE C
Fee (real)           ₹______       ₹______       ₹______
Duration (months)    ______        ______        ______
Live hours           ______        ______        ______

CURRICULUM
User research        Y / N         Y / N         Y / N
IA / user flows      Y / N         Y / N         Y / N
Prototyping          Y / N         Y / N         Y / N
Design systems       Y / N         Y / N         Y / N
Accessibility        Y / N         Y / N         Y / N
Case study writing   Y / N         Y / N         Y / N

PORTFOLIO
Weekly review        Y / N         Y / N         Y / N
Reviewed by          ______        ______        ______
Iterative feedback   Y / N         Y / N         Y / N

CAREER
Mock interviews      Y / N         Y / N         Y / N
Placement scope      Y / N         Y / N         Y / N
Refund policy        Y / N         Y / N         Y / N

Fill this in BEFORE any counsellor meeting.

Faculty scorecard:

Trainer name: ______________
Portfolio URL: ______________
Live products: ______________
LinkedIn verified:  Yes / No

Teaches live:        Yes / No
Demo class attended: Yes / No
Batch size:          ______
Doubts per week:     ______
Reviews your Figma:  Yes / No
Shares own work:     Yes / No

PORTFOLIO QUALITY
Visual craft:                __ / 5
Process depth:               __ / 5
Live / shipped products:     __ / 5
Case study quality:          __ / 5

Total: ___ / 20

Below 12: look elsewhere.
12-16: worth another visit.
17+: strong candidate.

An honest trainer will show you a project
they're not proud of — that's a green flag.
A trainer with only polished concepts and
no real products is a red flag.

Final decision notes:

Institute A visit:
Date: ________
Trainer met: ______________
Portfolio seen: Y / N
Batch size: ______
Questions unanswered:
 1. ______________________
 2. ______________________
Gut feeling: ____ / 5

Institute B visit:
Date: ________
Trainer met: ______________
Portfolio seen: Y / N
Batch size: ______
Questions unanswered:
 1. ______________________
 2. ______________________
Gut feeling: ____ / 5

Decision: ______________________
One-line reason: ______________
Start date: ______________
Fee agreed: ₹______

If undecided in a week:
Pick the one whose trainer's portfolio
you'd want to have in a year.